IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD

No.Cr/-7519               of 2024.                    dated:       23-7-2024.

Sessions Case No.460/2024.

The   State ………….vs……….. Fayaz Narejo & Ors

To,

The Sr. Superintendent Central Prison, and

In-Charge Correctional Facility & Correction Service,

H Y D E R A B A D.

SUBJECT:   RELEASE OF ACCUSED GHULAM MUSTAFA AND SHOUKAT.

                Whereas, accused Ghulam Mustafa s/o Saleh, Narejo and Shoukat s/o Hadi Bux, Mallah are confined in your jail custody in connection with the above titled case pending trial before this Court.

                And whereas, learned DDPP for the State was put on notice under Section 265-K Cr.PC as to why the accused may not be acquitted from the charges of this case. In response to such notice, learned DDPP for the State submitted that it would be appropriate to record evidence in this case after framing proper charge against the accused.  I am not agree with suggestion of learned DDPP for the State as in case the charge is framed against the accused and evidence is recorded, it will not improve the prosecution case as setup in FIR. There is nothing available on record to connect the accused in commission of this offence. The Police file shows that there no any other evidence collected during investigation against the accused, therefore, accused are acquitted from the charge of this case u/Section 265-K Cr.PC.

                You are hereby directed to release above said accused  Ghulam Mustafa s/o Saleh, Narejo and Shoukat s/o Hadi Bux, Mallah forthwith if they are not required in any other custody case.

                Given under my hand and seal of this Court,

                This the 23^rd day of July, 2024.

(Zahoor Ahmed Hakro)

SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD.